When Hillary Clinton was found to be using a personal email address to conduct state affairs it was immediately clear Mrs. Clinton had no respect for federal law.
What was unclear was whether or not her use of a private email address put the U.S. in any danger or not.
The argument was a private email would be insecure and sensitive data could be hacked.
Of course Hillary denied she ever used those emails to transfer classified information; but you’re about to learn what a lie that was.
Business Insider reports:
Classified emails that were stored on the private email server of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contained information from five US intelligence agencies, McClatchy reports.
A congressional official with knowledge of the matter told McClatchy that intelligence officials who saw the five classified emails determined that they included information from five US spy agencies.
One classified email — now public and pertaining to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi — reportedly contained information from the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
McClatchy added, citing the official, that the “other four classified emails contained information from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence [DNI] and the CIA.”
Last week, government inspectors told the Justice Department in a letter that “secret government information may have been compromised in the unsecured system she used at her New York home during her tenure as secretary of state,” according to The Associated Press.
The inspectors requested the department to look into the possible mishandling of classified information on the server from Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state.
Clinton, Democratic presidential front-runner in the 2016 election, has repeatedly said she broke no laws or rules by forgoing a standard government email account in favor of the private account. She has also said, as recently as last weekend, that she is “confident” she did not send or receive classified information by email.
Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement last week that Clinton “followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials.”
But the inspector general of the intelligence community, in a letter to Congress, said a limited sampling of Clinton’s emails in question found at least four that contained classified information and should have been considered secret.
If Clinton had a technical security team to monitor her server for suspicious activity, Clinton could have had a system at least as secure at the State Department. If not, the information would have been vulnerable.
“The layers of security that would have to be employed to make a privately run exchange server as secure as something that is secured by the federal government would be pretty significant,” Timothy Ryan, a former FBI supervisory special agent who now manages cyber investigations for Kroll, told The Washington Post in March. “It’s not that it can’t be done. I just find it improbable.”
Clinton has said that the email system was established during Bill Clinton’s presidential administration (1993-2001), and her team has stated that “her family’s electronic communications was taken seriously from the onset.”
No matter the level of security the Clintons employed — which is still largely unknown — the fact that this information was found on her personal server highlights why officials in her position are supposed to use government emails.
“Even if Secretary Clinton or her aides didn’t run afoul of any criminal provisions, the fact that classified information was identified within the emails is exactly why use of private emails … is not supposed to be allowed,” said Bradley Moss, a Washington attorney who specializes in national security matters, told McClatchy. “Both she and her team made a serious management mistake that no one should ever repeat.”
This report is especially damaging to the Hillary campaign as it shows she’s not capable of telling the truth, nor is she capable of protecting classified information.
We already know she absconded for her responsibilities to keep U.S. citizens safe in Benghazi and this proves she truly doesn’t have what it takes to safely lead this country forward.
Mrs. Clinton continues to take a beating in public opinion polls, and this certainly won’t help her at all.
Did this come as a surprise to you?
Tell us what you think in the comments below.